3 ms·
> will there be work on making PREEMPT_RT a boot-time or run-time choice rather than build-time? Given the performance critical nature of how this changes thin
by chippiewill 5y ago
> will there be work on making PREEMPT_RT a boot-time or run-time choice rather than build-time?
Given the performance critical nature of how this changes things I personally think it's unlikely. It does stuff like change the way spinlocks work in the Kernel which would be not only difficult, but expensive without recompilation. The best I think you'll get is a boot-time option to switch between pre-compiled kernels.
That being said, most of the RT Linux patches over the years are actually compiled in all the time anyway so a lot of these improvements have been incorporated for a long time.
- marcan_42 5y agoIt's not impossible; Linux already has a mechanism for this (alternatives, static keys), which allows patching code at runtime. It is used precisely for this kind of thing, where you don't want the performance impact of branching every time to decide what code path to use. However, while it can practically eliminate code overhead, it can't eliminate data overhead. I'm guessing the RT stuff does add overhead to data structures, and alternatives wouldn't fix that.