3 ms·
How effective is tracking in increasing user experience over less invasive techniques, e.g. like asking users?
by runarberg 5y ago
How effective is tracking in increasing user experience over less invasive techniques, e.g. like asking users?
- TZVdosOWs3kZHus 5y agoThis! The most valuable information is collected via classic communication! We include basic opt-in tracking (selectable in our installer) to get information about basic usage untangled to certain users. While this is just a statistical overview, it shows to us which parts of our software get used only for the customers who activated this kind of tracking. The most valuable information we get is through our forum which is open to everyone regardless of whether tracking is activated or not.
- pfooti 5y agoMost companies do both. If just asking users questions was strictly better than passive tracking, that's probably all they'd do - analytics have a real cost to use, that cost wouldn't be paid if the information gathered was useless. But, people are pretty remarkably bad at asking for things. It's mostly the "better horse" problem. People ask for fixes to proximal issues (make this faster, cheaper, better) and not the big things. In my own product, we use gtm to understand where in our sign up funnel people fall off. It is a complicated product and a complicated sign up flow. Since people who fall out of the funnel are unreachable, we can't just ask them why. But we can observe that (say) 40% of users bounce off of step X, so let's make that step easier.