3 ms·
I don't recall that David Suzuki ever cost Canadians significant amounts of money in policing. That's what OP was talking about - the cost of policing. There is
by ksaj 5y ago
I don't recall that David Suzuki ever cost Canadians significant amounts of money in policing. That's what OP was talking about - the cost of policing. There is also the significant cleanup.
If David Suzuki conducted a protest, then his organization would be expected to pay for the license, the cleanup, and the policing.
I don't know what the final bill will be, but this one event is well into the tens of millions. Nobody from the protest seems too interested in paying for these expenses, and instead are hoping to leave it to Canadians to pay through taxes.
- frabbit 5y agoCouldn't they just criminally charge David Suzuki for "counselling to commit mischief" (current charge against the protest "leader") if he says that tree-sitting to stop old-growth fortest destruction is a good idea? Sounds like democracy costs money to police. It would be much easier to just be able to "clear out" downtown (as the CBC puts it).
- inter_netuser 5y agoStrange how nobody wants to denounce David Suzuki Foundation for getting foreign funding. Suddenly it's now about policing costs, for some reason. It's almost like there is an approved list of causes/entities that are pre-approved for unlimited amounts of foreign funding.