3 ms·
Err, while squeakjs is impressive (and I have spent quite a while doodling within it, using old squeak images, and current cuis images), one cannot in good cons
by isr 5y ago
Err, while squeakjs is impressive (and I have spent quite a while doodling within it, using old squeak images, and current cuis images), one cannot in good conscience call it "fast".
In fact, if keeping one eye on the truth, then one couldn't call it "slow" either.
If performance IMPROVED by one order of magnitude, then you could call it "slow".