35 ms·
A Resnet is not conscious, but one could argue that an RL agent, by some definitions of consciousness, is conscious. If the measure of consciousness is the abi
by PartiallyTyped 5y ago
A Resnet is not conscious, but one could argue that an RL agent, by some definitions of consciousness, is conscious.
If the measure of consciousness is the ability to have a subjective experience, then that requires that the object has an internal state that is modified, thus the same experience in different agents results in different modifications, ergo, it is subjective.
If a requirement for conscious experience is the capacity for self reference, then Hofstadter has already argued that that can be achieved with very simple rules of inference and natural numbers.
An RL agent that can plan ahead and take into consideration its own internal state could be argued to be conscious, by even stricter means that require that the agent is aware of its own existence.
To me, it looks as if humanity is trying to find ways to argue that it is anything but meatware. But I guess accepting that we are just computational units implies that agency is not a thing, and humanity isn't ready for this conversation.
- bonoboTP 5y agoFor many people, this is a transcendental, almost religious claim, so no amount of technical discussion will convince them. Essentially, consciousness has taken on the role of the soul as the concept on which we hang our humanistic ideals, like the protection of human dignity and human life, human rights etc. Many people see this threatened when people say consciousness isn't special and human and instead can be possessed by silicon. That's what you are up against, when you argue in this topic.