4 ms·
I'm pretty sure they're exhibiting confusion about the JVM vs. the browser plugin.
by code_duck 15y ago
I'm pretty sure they're exhibiting confusion about the JVM vs. the browser plugin.
- srazzaque 15y agoAgreed - this has very little to do with the JVM and server-side Java processes. Java applets.. shudder
- ars 15y agoA bug (exploit) in the JVM is a bug, it doesn't matter if you are running it server side or client side. The only reason it doesn't matter server-side is that you are not trying to exploit your own installation. But the bug is still there.
- srazzaque 15y agoOf course, the JVM is the JVM wherever it runs, but when one is under the impression of a blanket statement like "Java is secure", they're likely to be thinking of server-side processes which rarely get compromised for reasons you've stated - despite having the same "level of security" wrt vulnerabilities.
- ars 15y agoYou don't know that. Depending on the type of bug (for example a string overflow) simply accepting data from someone else could trigger it.