3 ms·
It’s good that this is listed in the terms, but this raises two concerns: 1) People don’t read terms. Should they? Yes. Do they? No. 2) This language is more
by haswell 5y ago
It’s good that this is listed in the terms, but this raises two concerns:
1) People don’t read terms. Should they? Yes. Do they? No.
2) This language is more like a disclaimer than a term of use. I would not assume that disclaimers about the accuracy of the result would be found in the terms.
So yes, the terms link is prominent, but no, I don’t think it addresses this issue.