4 ms·
The *BSDs are nonexistent in the raw data [1]. Of course less code leads to less security holes. But 0/376? Or is project zero excluding BSDs entirely? [1] ht
by sitting_duck 5y ago
The *BSDs are nonexistent in the raw data [1].
Of course less code leads to less security holes. But 0/376? Or is project zero excluding BSDs entirely?
[1] https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/list?sort=id&colspec=ID%20Status%20Restrict%20Finder%20Reported%20Deadline%20Remaining%20CVE%20Vendor%20Product%20Summary&q=status%21%3DInvalid%20id%3E%3D1748%20id%3C%3D2248%20Deadline%3A90&can=1 https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/list?sort=id...
- tomnipotent 5y agoI don't believe Chrome provides support for BSD, which explains why it's missing.
- sitting_duck 5y agoHow? I referenced the underlying data. They have Microsoft kernel bugs. Zoom bugs. Even systemd. What am I missing? I think they coincidentally happen to have their bug tracker hosted on chromium’s site.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]