3 ms·
The last time I saw such a comparison HP was in the lead with over 200 days to fix. This time Microsoft is in the lead with 90. HP doesn't seem to produce SW an
by rurban 5y ago
The last time I saw such a comparison HP was in the lead with over 200 days to fix. This time Microsoft is in the lead with 90. HP doesn't seem to produce SW anymore. Or Google's project zero team doesn't care about them.
- fmajid 5y agoMicrosoft has improved dramatically compared to the days of Windows 95. Apple, on the other hand, is mired in complacency.
- mnem 5y agoDoesn't the data in that blog show Apple improving faster than MicroSoft? Going from taking longer than to fix bugs in 2019 to being faster than them now? It's pretty impressive that everyone seems to have reduced their time to fix bugs. Linux is doing an amazing job there.
- helpfulclippy 5y agoI'm always really disappointed every time I hear an account from security researchers about how difficult it is to deal with Apple. I realize that Apple cannot possibly be alone in this, but there's something especially frustrating about a company that aggressively denies choice to its users, cites security as a major benefit of that, and then ignores critical feedback about vulnerabilities.
- Mikeb85 5y agoIf you don't admit to vulnerabilities they don't exist, right?
- helpfulclippy 5y ago
- fmajid 5y agoJust one example, reneging on bug bounties is mind-blowingly stupid for a $3T company. Security researchers will sell what they find to the likes of NSO Pegasus instead of Apple. Also, the bad blood thus created makes them less likely to follow "responsible disclosure" and instead just disclose them as soon as discovered for kudos.
- mrweasel 5y agoHP spun its software out in HP Software Division and sold the whole thing to everyones favorite legacy software company: Micro Focus.