I don't think this logic checks out. "If you have a lot of fire, it will burn down a house. But you can also have a little fire in a house and it doesn't burn d

I don't think this logic checks out. "If you have a lot of fire, it will burn down a house. But you can also have a little fire in a house and it doesn't burn down. Ergo, if fire can exist without a house burning down, fire isn't the cause." To me that's the same logic, but maybe I'm wrong.