>I dunno maybe instead of being worried about deep fakes we should be worried that in 2022 people still believe it's possible to judge "trustworthiness" based o

>I dunno maybe instead of being worried about deep fakes we should be worried that in 2022 people still believe it's possible to judge "trustworthiness" based on nothing more than a headshot. Where was this even published, the New England Journal of Phrenology? I generally agree with your sentiment, but I don't believe this is an indication of progress for the most part. That is, we shouldn't necessarily trust that because it's the current year we should have been able to progress past the point of relying on intuition. Although I agree with you that relying on intuition is fraught with error, it's very innately human, and I wouldn't expect people to be able to "progress" past it.