5 ms·
They are better than most VAE models at not averaging, but they may still not be covering the entire data distribution. That would probably imply that the under
by ckrapu 5y ago
They are better than most VAE models at not averaging, but they may still not be covering the entire data distribution. That would probably imply that the underdispersed samples are closer to the average. We don’t have great metrics for figuring out how complete that coverage is.