3 ms·
Mere supply and demand fails to value basic labors in a way that makes them economically viable. Which is it? We continue to undervalue basic labors, and by t
by ddingus 5y ago
Mere supply and demand fails to value basic labors in a way that makes them economically viable.
Which is it?
We continue to undervalue basic labors, and by that I mean the income from them is less than it actually costs laborers to perform them
, or
We subsidize them?
If we agree to the latter, then we need to make sure all that makes sense and there should be no shame, no blame, and it should be ordinary and expected to be getting assistance despite working.
Right now, we consider that labor near worthless, despite society depending on it massively, and we discourage people from getting assistance and do all manner of things to basically shame people doing those labors despite the fact that we know they are necessary in most cases and we know a lot of people will be doing them.
Again, which is it?
- gruez 5y ago>Mere supply and demand fails to value basic labors in a way that makes them economically viable. >Which is it? >We continue to undervalue basic labors, and by that I mean the income from them is less than it actually costs laborers to perform them >, or >We subsidize them? We're already doing the latter, because if it's really the case that they're not "economically viable", the people would have starved to death long time ago. >there should be no shame, no blame, and it should be ordinary and expected to be getting assistance despite working. >[...] we discourage people from getting assistance and do all manner of things to basically shame people doing those labors despite the fact that we know they are necessary in most cases and we know a lot of people will be doing them. I'm not against society subsidizing the lifestyle of people who are not productive enough to afford it, but judging by your other comments, you seem to be against companies hiring the very same people for extra money. >Right now, we consider that labor near worthless, despite society depending on it massively that's not a contradiction. Civilization is "massively" dependent on clean drinking water, yet you can get it from the tap for pennies a gallon.
- ddingus 5y agoBTW: you totally sucked me back in. Great discussion partner. Normally, when I say I won't respond again, I don't. Never personal, just letting the other parties know intent. Giving consideration. Hoping to get it back and usually I do. In your case, the great comments... ah well. Happens. Nicely done.