2 ms·
Just because your ISP has enough IPs for its customers doesn't mean that there's no shortage and everybody has enough. I'm behind CGNAT. I set up a wireguard t
by BenjiWiebe 5y ago
Just because your ISP has enough IPs for its customers doesn't mean that there's no shortage and everybody has enough.
I'm behind CGNAT. I set up a wireguard tunnel to a VPS to allow inbound connections, but that adds cost, complexity, and latency...
- can16358p 5y agoSame here. CGNAT for years. I was into running home servers at some point, where I called my ISP and they kindly put me into a different pool where the IP is NOT static but a real IP (non-CGNAT). Actually now looking back, unless I need to host something at home (which is a hobby than a need) I find CGNAT to be actually safer while still using IP addresses efficiently. I'd still want to see real v6 adoption though.