4 ms·
Yep, I have zero ISPs in my country supporting IPv6 AFAIK. Data centers support it, but nothing for home connections. Major ISP performed some IPv6 tests. In 2
by vbezhenar 5y ago
Yep, I have zero ISPs in my country supporting IPv6 AFAIK. Data centers support it, but nothing for home connections.
Major ISP performed some IPv6 tests. In 2012. No news since then.
Funny thing is that despite all IPv4 "shortage" I have white IPv4 right now and can accept connections. Also it's almost static, unless I'd turn off my modem for a prolonged period of time, it won't change. So no real shortage, it seems.
- BenjiWiebe 5y agoJust because your ISP has enough IPs for its customers doesn't mean that there's no shortage and everybody has enough. I'm behind CGNAT. I set up a wireguard tunnel to a VPS to allow inbound connections, but that adds cost, complexity, and latency...
- can16358p 5y agoSame here. CGNAT for years. I was into running home servers at some point, where I called my ISP and they kindly put me into a different pool where the IP is NOT static but a real IP (non-CGNAT). Actually now looking back, unless I need to host something at home (which is a hobby than a need) I find CGNAT to be actually safer while still using IP addresses efficiently. I'd still want to see real v6 adoption though.
- LinAGKar 5y ago>So no real shortage, it seems. Which is why ISPs are pushing carrier-grade NAT.