3 ms·
"would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution" And it successfully achieved this spe
by vl 5y ago
"would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution"
And it successfully achieved this specific goal, however it never claimed it is a good solution for micro/small payments, which is a requirement for "normal currency". Payments of small amounts require small fees and quick settlement time, neither of which Bitcoin has by design.
- deanCommie 5y agoWell this is where, as any good developer, you have to look at the requirement and ask "why?" > ... without going through a financial institution. Why? Why don't we want to go through a financial institution? Well, honestly, the only REAL reasons are fees on large transactions, and the desire/preference to be able to conduct activities that are illegal by regulated financial institutions. And that, if we all remember, was the only usecase for bitcoin before speculation - buying drugs and even more illegal things on TOR marketplaces. Well, that and money laundering.
- can16358p 5y agoI live in a corrupted country with a corrupted government and don't trust my government a single bit. I'd happily use and adopt crypto. I don't do anything illegal, I just don't want corrupted and evil people having control over my assets.
- deanCommie 5y ago> I just don't want corrupted and evil people having control over my assets. Have I got some news for you about the 51% of people who control all the most popular blockchains :(
- user-the-name 5y agoHere are the words of Satoshi himself: > Once it gets bootstrapped, there are so many applications if you could effortlessly pay a few cents to a website as easily as dropping coins in a vending machine. This claim that Bitcoin was never meant to be a payment system for small payments is 100% historical revisionism.