4 ms·
Thanks for the link. I don't see any occurrences of "Rust" in this document...
by verdagon 5y ago
Thanks for the link.
I don't see any occurrences of "Rust" in this document...
- pjmlp 5y agohttps://devblogs.microsoft.com/cppblog/new-safety-rules-in-c-core-check/ https://devblogs.microsoft.com/cppblog/new-safety-rules-in-c... Better like this?
- verdagon 5y agoThanks! This article makes some nice recommendations, but they don't have much to do with Rust, these things have been in a lot of other mainstream languages for a long time. I'm not sure this supports zozbot's claim that the modern trend is to "refactor C++ code so that it's more Rust-like" very strongly. I also assume they meant that that we should adhere to AxM in C++ (since that's the only thing new Rust brings), to make interop with Rust easier, but I could be interpreting incorrectly.