2 ms·
> However, while some WordPress users may be content with a vanilla installation, there are many who are not. Very true. But it is clear that WP's broad trajec
by unfocussed_mike 5y ago
> However, while some WordPress users may be content with a vanilla installation, there are many who are not.
Very true. But it is clear that WP's broad trajectory is towards GUI-configurable, block layout themes that do satisfy more users. They are doing more on this than any other CMS project.
> A traditional way to add functionality and style to a WordPress installation is to add plugins and themes. These plugins and themes are not sandboxed, and operate with full privileges.
This is true, as is the risk with third party plugins. (Though ultimately end users will just install some other bodgy CMS if they can't get what they want from plugins. The tradeoff with WP is that those plugins receive some scrutiny through vulnerability databases, better educated WP developers etc.)
Sandboxing themes is always going to be a little tricky, but it is plausible (and indeed it's not out of the question to project WP moving in that direction, given the way its internals are being reconsidered around the REST API).
But do you know of any widely-installable, user-friendly CMS that sandboxes its plugins? That is a huge undertaking. It's something I've thought of many times before, but I can't think of a way to make that practical on the sheer range of hosting options that WP makes possible.