This seems like such a thoughtless, knee jerk response to the points being made. You must not think that replacing a worker with a robot reduces inequality? Tha

This seems like such a thoughtless, knee jerk response to the points being made. You must not think that replacing a worker with a robot reduces inequality? That /employing/ is the same as /exploiting/ iff the employee is poor? I mean inequality is a poor metric anyway. Absolute communism reduces inequality to zero, but it doesn't improve overall outcomes.