4 ms·
There are no laws in Israel preventing companies like NSO from building and selling zero-day and zero-click exploits? Without proper regulations the Israeli gov
by pyman 5y ago
There are no laws in Israel preventing companies like NSO from building and selling zero-day and zero-click exploits? Without proper regulations the Israeli government is creating a sophisticated and dangerous platform for these kind of illegal attacks.
- markdown 5y agoIsrael are arguably the worlds biggest beneficiary of the arms trade. Why would they have anything against selling weapons?
- recuter 5y agoOnly in your active imagination. In reality it is roughly in 8th place with 3% marketshare. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/03/5-charts-that-reveal-the-state-of-the-global-arms-trade/ https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/03/5-charts-that-reveal-...
- lupire 5y agoNow try that analysis per capita.
- kevin_thibedeau 5y agoThat doesn't include the free weapons the US gives them with their annual stipend.
- markdown 5y agoAccording to that link, it's #1 per capita. Add to this the enormous annual gifts from the US, and you'll find that I'm correct. Per capita, they're the biggest beneficiaries of the arms trade, and the worlds largest arms dealer. I don't blame you for not seeing that though. The propaganda about Israel being in serious danger from stones and home made rockets is quite effective.
- jraby3 5y agoIn the article it states that it’s illegal to sell to over 90 countries. But maybe resellers are getting it to these countries?
- rmbyrro 5y agoThe Israeli government is exploiting NSO as a global diplomacy leverage. In exchange for approving the export of NSO software, they request foreign State support for their interests abroad, ranging from UN voting to commercial deals and anything in between.
- mastax 5y agoEssentially works like arms exports, which makes a lot of sense.
- sva_ 5y agoI don't think NSO is building & selling exploits. They're buying and renting them out. Exploit-as-a-service.
- kworks 5y agoA super reductive way of explaining it is it's because a lot of state actors (including NSA) have a lot of skin in the game through active, deep investment in the cyber weapon market. State actors strongly incentivize the 'attack' side of the market while companies historically disincentivize the 'defense' side. A solid elucidation of the system (for laypeople like me) can be found in Nicole Perlroth's book "This is How They Tell Me the World Ends": https://browse.nypl.org/iii/encore/record/C__Rb22352302__SThis%20Is%20How%20They%20Tell%20Me%20the%20World%20Ends%3A%20The%20Cyberweapons%20Arms%20Race__P0%2C1__Orightresult__U__X4?lang=eng&suite=def https://browse.nypl.org/iii/encore/record/C__Rb22352302__STh... Anyone interested in learning more about how NSO group operates can check out digitalviolence: https://www.digitalviolence.org/#/ https://www.digitalviolence.org/#/
- tptacek 5y agoWhat would outlawing NSO Group accomplish? The trade would simply move to jurisdictions with even less oversight.