4 ms·
That's a defeatist position. 99% of the problem is just wanting to not have to rewrite a hundred parsers in memory-safe languages. It's just economics and eng
by xyzzy123 5y ago
That's a defeatist position.
99% of the problem is just wanting to not have to rewrite a hundred parsers in memory-safe languages.
It's just economics and engineering.
They don't have to change everyone's minds or fix the world. They'd need to invest a lot but so far nobody really thinks it's worth it.
- CyberRage 5y agoPeople try to address that will simpler solutions that wouldn't break backwards compatibility or require a full re-write. Isolation, mitigation and prevention of exploitation is common.