> Also, they're not really coupled to reproductive fitness. More fat tissue in breasts has no consequence for mamalian function. It is my understanding that it

> Also, they're not really coupled to reproductive fitness. More fat tissue in breasts has no consequence for mamalian function. It is my understanding that it was generally believed that large breasts meant more milk until the 1950s or so. So there may still be an element of truth in assuming that stereotypical male preference for large breast could be selecting for reproduction – just with a cultural bias. That being said, I generally agree with you. I know that I'm not attracted to the stereotype "everyone knows"/fashion model as a potential partner, far from it.