3 ms·
My larger point is these "companies" appear to have no interest in making money. I'm not suggesting you need to be making money every single minute of your com
by timjahn 15y ago
My larger point is these "companies" appear to have no interest in making money. I'm not suggesting you need to be making money every single minute of your company's existence.
Instead, I'm suggesting that you should be interested in (and actively working toward) making money.
- ig1 15y agoThe fact they're raising investment is a pretty clear statement that they want to make money. Just because they're not choosing to focus on revenue at this stage of product development doesn't really mean they have no interest in making money. Any company needs to decide where their focus should be, Tumblr may well have done the analysis and decided that rather than take their focus away from their core product and focus on monetization (which may only generate a few hundred million in revenue at this stage) it's better for them to focus on their core product now in order to have a chance of monetizing at the billion dollar range in the future. It's a perfectly rational economic decision.
- gks 15y agoTumblr was founded in 2007. That makes it nearly 4 years old. Twitter was founded in 2006. That makes it nearly 5 years old. At what point in their "Humble Beginnings" do you suggest they start thinking about making some money and becoming self-sustaining? Somewhere along the way they need to focus on being able to provide for themselves. Otherwise it's a giant ponzi scheme where all you get are investors investing in a product that won't return their investment.
- ig1 15y agoAt the point where it makes more sense to focus on monetization rather than growing the user-base in order to maximize the lifetime revenue of the company (as opposed to current revenue). It's silly to put some arbitrary deadline on something which should clearly be based upon company metrics.