This is not a counter-point, this is an ad hominem attack (despite its protestation to the contrary) that doesn’t address any of the serious problems that Meyer

This is not a counter-point, this is an ad hominem attack (despite its protestation to the contrary) that doesn’t address any of the serious problems that Meyerowitz-Katz found with those studies. Problems severe enough to force retractions from the relevant journals. The credibility of Meyerowitz-Katz (and others like him) rests on the quality of his claims and analyses, not on whether he blocks people on Twitter.