3 ms·
that's so interesting. and an odd ruling?! I've boughten yahoo email ads. and tried gmails promoted version. it's a really interesting idea and seems better tha
by dillondoyle 5y ago
that's so interesting. and an odd ruling?! I've boughten yahoo email ads. and tried gmails promoted version. it's a really interesting idea and seems better than outright spam
plus email inboxes have a huge amount of valuable data it could be one of the most relevant ad experiences if they truly leveraged that data. I buy ads and don't have a problem with a lot of the industry, i'm minority on that here. To me highly relevant ads are way better than mortgage loan quicken shit ads and virus crap I see otherwise.
- GekkePrutser 5y agoI think part of the difference here is that you see ads at all. Most of us who hate tracking block ads completely so it's not a choice between relevant ads or irrelevant ones. Either way we don't see them so limiting tracking has no downsides. But I would especially hate ads showing up in my mailbox. I pay for O365 business so they don't, but if they did I would drop the service immediately. Spam is a big problem and artificially adding ads on top of all that makes it even bigger.