2 ms·
This makes sense and, although I didn't include it in my comment, the buoyancy was part of my curiosity. While it's clever to take advantage of the buoyancy cre
by earthscienceman 5y ago
This makes sense and, although I didn't include it in my comment, the buoyancy was part of my curiosity. While it's clever to take advantage of the buoyancy created by the air cavity, if they're nearly-buoyant that would also mean that the variability in traffic would create a significantly variable (as a percentage) load. I wonder how this is accounted for.
For the record, I don't think I'm "gotcha-ing" the engineers by thinking of these questions. I'm sure there have been answer to these questions since before the project began, it's just that I would like to know the answers.
They also must have a way to seal off segments in case of a water breach? Although, that seems awful given there will be human traffic in the tunnel
- mattashii 5y agoSee the video for answers: After putting in a segment, the trench is backfilled with rocky material (over the segment), so that any buoyancy is negated by the fact that it's held down by a large layer of rocks. This layer presumably also prevents most, if not all, leaks from generating instant floods in the tunnel. Lastly, once completed the project will result in 5 parallel, but mostly independent tunnels (two train tunnels, two highway tunnels, and a service tunnel between the highway tunnels). I presume that the tunnels can be isolated and waterproofed seperately.