2 ms·
> But you seem to be saying it is the seller's responsibility to understand the buyer's product and evaluate the integration during due diligence? I'm not OP,
by sangnoir 5y ago
> But you seem to be saying it is the seller's responsibility to understand the buyer's product and evaluate the integration during due diligence?
I'm not OP, but I don't think that's what they meant:
>> the product not being able to integrate with your product like they claimed
It's lack of due diligence by the buyer after being deceived (intentionally or not). I imagine the seller saying "We support gRPC too, so we can interop easily" and then discovering that's not quite the case afterwards.
- 0xbadcafebee 5y agoYep. It's 100% the buyers' responsibility to vet what they're buying, but the seller can obscure a lot until after the sale. It's like buying a used car. You need a mechanic to really get in there and find all the rotten bits, based on where you intend to drive it (and how long)