2 ms·

I don't think this shields the company from liability. Instead it provides some ammunition to use in the event of a lawsuit. Things are very different between

I don't think this shields the company from liability. Instead it provides some ammunition to use in the event of a lawsuit. Things are very different between employees and the general public. I imagine a jury would find that a lady-busting security robot is negligent by default. Whereas, a fork lift driver would be assumed to be doing his job and that situational negligence would need to be proven.

bluGill 5y ago
Note that my company does a lot of mandatory training before you are allowed to enter the manufacturing areas. Forklift safety is only a part of it (though a large part as everything else is common sense says you wouldn't do this while forklifts don't follow common sense rules) I agree if this is a public place a jury would and should find the robots at fault. (unless the robots are running some sort of arrest her routine, or knocking her over because a bad fall is still better than some other danger)
- foobarian 5y ago
  Obligatory forklift training video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTV2HdLnN7I https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTV2HdLnN7I https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forklift_Driver_Klaus_%E2%80%93_The_First_Day_on_the_Job https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forklift_Driver_Klaus_%E2%80%9...