3 ms·

> It is sort of sad but BSD is bad at publishing news and tutorials. Say what? https://www.freebsdnews.com/ https://www.freebsdnews.com/ http://undeadly.org/

> It is sort of sad but BSD is bad at publishing news and tutorials. Say what? https://www.freebsdnews.com/ https://www.freebsdnews.com/ http://undeadly.org/ http://undeadly.org/ https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/handbook/ https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/handbook/ https://docs.freebsd.org/en/ https://docs.freebsd.org/en/ https://mwl.io/nonfiction/os https://mwl.io/nonfiction/os https://nostarch.com/catalog/linux-bsd-unix https://nostarch.com/catalog/linux-bsd-unix https://www.reddit.com/r/freebsd/ https://www.reddit.com/r/freebsd/

johntdaly 5y ago
Yea, I know of undeadly and read it off and on, freebsdnews too. I stoped reading undeadly a while ago when they had a rather long lull in publishing. From a post further down I take it freebsdnews has the same problem. I fallow DragonflyBSD off and on, since it is the BSD that interests me the most and they to suck at publishing info. I get more info out of a release note about whats changed than by fallowing DragonflyBSD Digest or reading the mailing list archives. And publishing some books about the BSDs doesn’t really count as “tutorials”. I don’t think you are getting my point. The comment I respondet to wasn’t just interesting, it gave me a reason to care about FreeBSD and maybe a reason to read freebsdnews and give FreeBSD a try. You need a place where people from outside of your communities can go to get informed enough to actually care enough to install a specific BSD and start reading their news digest.