3 ms·
The distinction, and its relevance, are obvious. If you're going to feign ignorance I have better things to do with my day than argue with you about it.
by omnicognate 5y ago
The distinction, and its relevance, are obvious. If you're going to feign ignorance I have better things to do with my day than argue with you about it.
- jacquesm 5y agoThen why do you argue about it? Yes, there is a distinction, no it is not relevant. Just like to a blind person it would not matter what you wore so therefore 'looks' and 'what you are wearing' are closely related, related enough to both be used in this context.
- MrYellowP 5y agoSo you say that what someone wears does not contribute to how someone looks. That's quite the impressive opinion. Do you eat soup with a fork?