3 ms·
Hmm, I contemplated that at first but decided against it for some reason that’s not quite clear to me now, but I think I mispredicted its verbosity in both lite
by chrismorgan 5y ago
Hmm, I contemplated that at first but decided against it for some reason that’s not quite clear to me now, but I think I mispredicted its verbosity in both literal and compressed form.
For compression purposes, mine is going to be kinda like this:
‹M21 ›5‹H3v1h18›‹M21 ›11‹H3v1h18›‹M21 ›17‹H3v1h18›
Yours will probably treat only one block, slightly bigger, as a repeated thing:
M21‹ 5H3v1h18›m0‹ 5H3v1h18›m0‹ 5H3v1h18›
I expect that would compress 2–5 bytes smaller.
I’d lowercase that M, too; it doesn’t need to be uppercase, so it might as well be lowercase like the others!
- mproud 5y agoA couple fewer bits or bytes is not going to make a noticeable performance difference.
- chrismorgan 5y agoSo? Golfing things like this is mostly about fun, with a side benefit of being aware of things that, on a (much) larger scale, do start to matter.