3 ms·
I'm not sure I believe this represents state of the art in this area. I think they just have put enough hours into writing rules it does a passable job for the
by solarmist 5y ago
I'm not sure I believe this represents state of the art in this area. I think they just have put enough hours into writing rules it does a passable job for the biggest languages it supports. If you get enough rules it can look like progress.
I looked at the engine for the Japanese parsing and it looks like they are parsing Japanese in fundamentally the same way they are English and it's has been known for around 20 years that is insufficient. Japanese requires tagging be done in order to tokenize it not the reverse as is done with English.
Take a look at spaCy if you're interested in what's possible nowadays, but it's not an end user product.
Edit: it's not quite that bad they're using GoSen which stopped being used only about 10 years ago.
- itazula 5y agoYes, I put in Japanese that was nonsense, and it passed with flying colors.
- solarmist 5y agoYeah, I figured. That's why there are almost no NLP tools on the market that support Asian languages, in particular Japanese, Korean, and somewhat Chinese (Chinese is its own thing because of the large number of engineers it has to throw at problems).