Whatever argument you're using right now is exactly in support of the current situation. - Votes (indirectly) set the current allocation - Votes (indirectly)

Whatever argument you're using right now is exactly in support of the current situation. - Votes (indirectly) set the current allocation - Votes (indirectly) set the current tax rate - Votes (indirectly) mean that Schmidt has his current money pile - Thus, this argument is perfectly in line with Schmidt choosing to take 125M of that money pile and giving it to sources he cares about. - This argument is not in line with raising his tax rate to fund whatever the voting allocation is.