4 ms·
I want to reject all of them, at a protocol level, and never see another one again. That this wasn't written into the "Cookie Law" is proof to me that GDPR and
by emptysongglass 5y ago
I want to reject all of them, at a protocol level, and never see another one again. That this wasn't written into the "Cookie Law" is proof to me that GDPR and Schrems II are largely written by people who don't understand the technical ramifications of pushing legislation like this through.
- Hjfrf 5y ago"Do not track" is exactly the feature you're talking about and already exists in all common browsers. What it's missing is a reason for websites to comply, which is what a law could enforce.
- emptysongglass 5y agoBut it didn't, again begging the wisdom of the "Cookie Law" authors.
- account42 5y agoHow do you reject server-side tracking based on IP and other unique bits at the protocol level?
- robbedpeter 5y agoUse vpns and software that only communicates the minimum necessary information required for a transaction. Browsers don't have to provide uniquely identifiable information. Surveillance was a voluntary choice implemented by developers, not a necessary evil.