I thought the cost per launch for Starship was going to be even less than the non-heavy F9 because it's more reusable. > The evidence for this is the relativel

I thought the cost per launch for Starship was going to be even less than the non-heavy F9 because it's more reusable. > The evidence for this is the relatively few Falcon Heavy launches we've had and are planned. I don't think that's very good evidence. The first Falcon Heavy flight was only 4 years ago and there have been 3 launches until now. Presumably people design their missions around what's available and proven reliable so I would expect it to ramp up. Looks like there are 5/6 Falcon Heavy launches on the cards for this year.