4 ms·
> Because you, in debating the exclusion, chose to debate the relative merits of broad topics rather than specific articles. The reference wasn't general, it wa
by UIUC_06 5y ago
> Because you, in debating the exclusion, chose to debate the relative merits of broad topics rather than specific articles. The reference wasn't general, it was to the specific thread.
I'll take "Weasel Wording" for $800, Alex.
As for your advice on challenging flags, the motive is certainly there to follow this procedure:
1. Flag a submission early in the morning, before anyone's had a chance to vote on it.
2. Commenting is unavailable to most people for most of the day.
3. If and when it gets unflagged, everyone's moved on.
4. Enhanced downvoting!
If you say no one's doing this: be transparent and prove it.
- AnimalMuppet 5y agoIt would seem to me that the burden of proof here is on you. And you should be able to prove it, if it's happening. Write a script that looks at the first N pages of the "New" listings. Count the number of posts that are flagged. Run the script every hour. After a few days, you should be able to either support or disprove your hypothesis.