4 ms·
Absolutely. But if it's only needed on a small fraction of networks, it might still be worth doing in order to write code that can otherwise assume QUIC.
by JoshTriplett 5y ago
Absolutely. But if it's only needed on a small fraction of networks, it might still be worth doing in order to write code that can otherwise assume QUIC.
- benmmurphy 5y agoif you control the client/server in these situations in might be worth just using HTTP/2 instead of QUIC for these networks. just write your protocol assuming 'streams' exist and then have a HTTP/2 and a QUIC implementation. this is what cloudflare does with their cloudflared tunnel.