4 ms·
I'm surprised to see just about all comments here agreeing with you. I was sure there would be a whole bunch of people saying that Teams is fine for their use,
by amanzi 5y ago
I'm surprised to see just about all comments here agreeing with you. I was sure there would be a whole bunch of people saying that Teams is fine for their use, but I guess I'm in a minority as I actually don't mind using Teams and performance is fine. For reference, I just exited Teams and re-opened it and it took 13 seconds to open, log me in, and update my status. I do have an i7 CPU and 16GB RAM, but I wouldn't describe my laptop as performant - it's just a small and light ultrabook.
- mmsimanga 5y agoThe 8G or RAM I have is more than the standard 4G of RAM for none developers. All these are company issued laptops. So an i7 with 16GB RAM is a powerful machine in my world.
- dx034 5y agoDo companies still buy laptops with 4GB ram? I partly have to work on a horribly slow work laptop with a crappy CPU, but even that one has 16GB memory.
- mmsimanga 5y agoAh man. I am in Africa and don't work for an IT company. So I presume those two factors given the cost of hardware here probably results in many people running on machines with 4GB of RAM. My anecdotal observation is that there is that price of hardware practically doubles from a machine with 4GB or RAM to one with 8GB of RAM. Thereafter increase isn't as jarring but I think it is enough to deter companies from buying 16GB machines.
- hackerfromthefu 5y agoThat should be a fast machine, and 13 seconds is an eternity in my workflows.