4 ms·

i think tunnelling quic over TCP might run into the same problems you have when tunnelling TCP/IP over TCP. if you have two congestion algorithms running then y

i think tunnelling quic over TCP might run into the same problems you have when tunnelling TCP/IP over TCP. if you have two congestion algorithms running then you get weird performance issues. http://sites.inka.de/~W1011/devel/tcp-tcp.html http://sites.inka.de/~W1011/devel/tcp-tcp.html

JoshTriplett 5y ago
Absolutely. But if it's only needed on a small fraction of networks, it might still be worth doing in order to write code that can otherwise assume QUIC.
- benmmurphy 5y ago
  if you control the client/server in these situations in might be worth just using HTTP/2 instead of QUIC for these networks. just write your protocol assuming 'streams' exist and then have a HTTP/2 and a QUIC implementation. this is what cloudflare does with their cloudflared tunnel.