28 ms·
I guess what I meant is:why is no one doing better than them? Most of the decent approaches I've seen were either coming from founders or once from an ex-engin
by throwawaynay 5y ago
I guess what I meant is:why is no one doing better than them?
Most of the decent approaches I've seen were either coming from founders or once from an ex-engineer who became a recruiter, basically never from a typical recruiter, why is no one obliterating them?
- t-3 5y agoIt's a "soft-skills" job, which requires dealing with many, many, many liars and cheats, and trying to maintain a reputation. Not a job that can be easily solved by technology.
- throwawaynay 5y ago"many liars and cheats" I guess it takes one to know one? A decent technical test would weed out any actual liar, no? or do we need people who thinks they're fbi interrogators?
- t-3 5y agoThere is no "one size fits all" technical test, and if there was, the answers would be for sale and you'd be back to square one. People are a hard problem.
- throwawaynay 5y agoI don't see how coding in front of someone(no matter the problem) can be worse than a random non technical guy trying to guess if you're lying or not
- t-3 5y agoNot all technical jobs involve coding, and of those that do, it's not always the top priority.