3 ms·
> Permits and building codes are there for the lender. Aight, so if I'm the lender for myself let me nix them. If they're for some third party lender, let the
by notch656a 5y ago
> Permits and building codes are there for the lender.
Aight, so if I'm the lender for myself let me nix them. If they're for some third party lender, let the lender and lendee solve that through private market rather than government. Surely someone can be trained to inspect a house.
> [ mention of Great Chicago Fire ]
The classic "make hundreds millions of people work for decades to afford a house, costing tens of millions of lifespans of work so we can save 300 people once a century from the great Chicago Fire". The calculus there is way way way off.
I'll take my chances.
>It wasn't that long ago
It wasn't that long ago housing was far more affordable.
> because a cow kicked over a lantern because lack of building codes
You've fallen victim to a big tale, like santa clause. No one knows the cause of that fire. We do know that many of the conditions were completely unsubject government, such as a windy dry spell.
>We have regulations for a reason
They're there for good reasons, unfortunately the worst tyrannies and misdeeds happen at the gunpoint of those who purport to be acting for the common good. Building codes in practice are as much about taking your life away as they are as preserving it.
- zbrozek 5y agoBuilding codes aren't nearly so bad as zoning and the NIMBYism that is strangling the country. There's certainly room to liberalize building codes, but I don't think the impact would be as large as one might hope. Liberalize land use please.