3 ms·
>Surely you still agree that Apple should apply their rules consistently? For all we know, Apple believes this too and is attempting to make this reality. It's
by dkonofalski 5y ago
>Surely you still agree that Apple should apply their rules consistently?
For all we know, Apple believes this too and is attempting to make this reality. It's not as simple to do when there are probably hundreds of these clones flooding the store and the review process within the span of a few days.
- raydev 5y ago> For all we know, Apple believes this too and is attempting to make this reality It doesn't matter what Apple plans, it's been more than a decade. They've made reviews faster and rejections more arbitrary. Resubmissions with 0 changes can lead to approvals. Useful apps are rejected because they don't meet a particular reviewer's standards on a particular day of the week. It's only become more inconsistent. > It's not as simple to do when there are probably hundreds of these clones flooding the store and the review process within the span of a few days. That's kinda the point. It's impossible to actually "curate" a store with millions of offerings. Apple should walk the walk and not just talk, and reduce the App Store to a few hundred apps that could conceivably be thoroughly reviewed by trained humans, or be honest and accept that their rules will always be inconsistently applied at current scale.
- dkonofalski 5y ago>be honest and accept that their rules will always be inconsistently applied at current scale Isn't that currently what's happening?
- raydev 5y agoNo, they aren't honest about it at all.