4 ms·
This is absolutely all correct, and also supports the basic argument that houses are not wildly more unaffordable now than they were in (say) 1990.
by runako 5y ago
This is absolutely all correct, and also supports the basic argument that houses are not wildly more unaffordable now than they were in (say) 1990.
- adam_arthur 5y agoAffordability is almost as bad as the 2000s peak already. If you judge by housing payment relative to income
- runako 5y agoWould you mind sharing a link to your source? I would love to update my mental cache? Thanks!
- adam_arthur 5y agoI'll try to find the chart I saw on this recently. But here's home price relative to median income, which is at a record. Then apply logic that mortgage rates are 4.1% now and likely to be 5% soon. https://www.longtermtrends.net/home-price-median-annual-income-ratio/ https://www.longtermtrends.net/home-price-median-annual-inco... 2000s affordability was still worse at the peak, but will shift quickly if mortgage rates continue to rise. Anyway, will edit when I find
- runako 5y agoInteresting, I have not seen Bankrate & Nerdwallet differ by this much before. (Bankrate is reporting rates in the range around 3.5%.)
- adam_arthur 5y agohttps://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/mortgage-rates https://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/mortgage-rates ^ is the source most in the industry use for the current rate. It tends to be the most up to date
- runako 5y agoJumbos at a half point below conforming. Is that normal? They are reporting 30-year fixed jumbo below a 5/1 ARM. Is this just a dislocation?
- adam_arthur 5y agoJumbos are usually below non jumbo conventional. https://www.builderonline.com/money/mortgage-finance/heres-why-jumbo-loans-have-lower-interest-rates_c https://www.builderonline.com/money/mortgage-finance/heres-w...
- runako 5y agoThank you!