3 ms·

I stand corrected, thank you. I had not seriously dug into where the word "infiltrate" came from or what it exactly meant. This would be a case where the source

I stand corrected, thank you. I had not seriously dug into where the word "infiltrate" came from or what it exactly meant. This would be a case where the sources I trust are likely sharing misinformation. From this article: https://lawandcrime.com/russia-investigation/the-words-infiltrate-and-spy-appear-exactly-zero-times-in-john-durhams-recent-court-filing-heres-what-it-actually-says-and-what-it-doesnt/ https://lawandcrime.com/russia-investigation/the-words-infil... While some might blur the line between “spying” and “exploit[ing] . . . access to non-public and/or proprietary Internet data,” the distinction is, based on what we know right now, critical. Durham has not alleged a violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), the Stored Communications Act (SCA), the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA), or the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) — all of which are major sources of law as to the prosecutions of federal computer crimes. I still believe I am still correct that the Steel Dossier and the Russian collusion story were entirely unfounded fabrications of the Clinton team, and I still believe that what they did there was worse than what Trump did on January 6, but this latest alleged Clinton scandal might be overblown.

fortuna86 5y ago
> I stand corrected, thank you Big of you to say. > I still believe I am still correct that the Steel Dossier and the Russian collusion story were entirely unfounded fabrications of the Clinton team Then you double down on more partisan nonsense. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/18/us/politics/senate-intelligence-russian-interference-report.html https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/18/us/politics/senate-intell... The GOP-led bipartisan commission concluded Russia attacked the 2016 election in favor of Trump, their words. You are again to the right of your own party. Also nothing in the Steele Dossier has been disproven, and lots of it has been collaborated. If you are still interested in what is true and what isn't, please continue reading with an open mind: https://www.lawfareblog.com/steele-dossier-retrospective https://www.lawfareblog.com/steele-dossier-retrospective https://www.justsecurity.org/44697/steele-dossier-knowing/ https://www.justsecurity.org/44697/steele-dossier-knowing/ https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/07/politics/dossier-two-years-later/index.html https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/07/politics/dossier-two-years-la...

fortuna86 5y ago

> I stand corrected, thank you Big of you to say. > I still believe I am still correct that the Steel Dossier and the Russian collusion story were entirely unfounded fabrications of the Clinton team Then you double down on more partisan nonsense. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/18/us/politics/senate-intelligence-russian-interference-report.html https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/18/us/politics/senate-intell... The GOP-led bipartisan commission concluded Russia attacked the 2016 election in favor of Trump, their words. You are again to the right of your own party. Also nothing in the Steele Dossier has been disproven, and lots of it has been collaborated. If you are still interested in what is true and what isn't, please continue reading with an open mind: https://www.lawfareblog.com/steele-dossier-retrospective https://www.lawfareblog.com/steele-dossier-retrospective https://www.justsecurity.org/44697/steele-dossier-knowing/ https://www.justsecurity.org/44697/steele-dossier-knowing/ https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/07/politics/dossier-two-years-later/index.html https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/07/politics/dossier-two-years-la...