3 ms·
The difference is in my example you're preventing someone from using a service that someone agreed to provide for an agreed upon price. Your example is a hand-
by bko 5y ago
The difference is in my example you're preventing someone from using a service that someone agreed to provide for an agreed upon price.
Your example is a hand-wavy hypothetical about how allowing some service impacts others by second and third order effects by what could be there instead.
Do you see the difference?
- rexpress 5y agoThe hand-wavy hypotheticals were there in both of our posts. And where you said "It's none of your business what 10% of people are doing. I don't know how it degrades quality of life" you were also explicitly hand-waving away the costs that these businesses impose on those not directly involved in the transactions. So yes, in my post I was at least considering these costs. In your post, you were choosing to wave them away as inconsequential. I certainly do see the difference.