4 ms·
> React makes sense for FB's bloated, complex web app. Your CRUD app will do fine with far simpler dev tools. And that would be what? Exactly? I did a persona
by H1Supreme 5y ago
> React makes sense for FB's bloated, complex web app. Your CRUD app will do fine with far simpler dev tools.
And that would be what? Exactly?
I did a personal project last year that was vanilla HTML/CSS/Js, with some templating in Go (I know it's templating isn't the best, comparatively). By the end, I wish I would have done it in React. I ended up re-inventing the wheel for a lot of things, and ended up with something that was decidedly messier. All while attempting to be more simplistic.
I wish Web Components would have taken off. When Polymer first launched, I was totally on board. I loved the idea of writing vanilla frontends, and using Web Components where I needed extended functionality (vs a full framework). But, it didn't, and unless your site is super simple, and mostly static, React et al. are the best ways to create frontends.
- zozbot234 5y agoSvelte is quite nice.
- finiteseries 5y agoTools actually intended for building non bloated, non complex CRUD apps. Django, Rails, Laravel, .NET, Spring, I can go on. Instead Go was selected, templating HTML by hand, and assumedly doing nearly everything else by hand well. That is not the optimal solution for a simple CRUD app’s implementation, and isn’t reflective of anything but poor engineering.