4 ms·
Wow! A simple 3D game in 425KB. For me, google.com is 1.47MB. It makes you wonder what they put inside.
by danuker 5y ago
Wow! A simple 3D game in 425KB.
For me, google.com is 1.47MB. It makes you wonder what they put inside.
- miohtama 5y agoThis is not the world we wished for, but this is the world we deserve.
- encryptluks2 5y agoNah, we don't deserve it. We just don't have a choice at this point until someone is capable of creating an alternative to JavaScript.
- CamperBob2 5y agoNah, we don't deserve it. We just don't have a choice at this point until someone is capable of creating an alternative to JavaScript. Didn't you mean "an alternative to Google?" Don't blame the tool for the (lack of) craftsmanship.
- encryptluks2 5y agoIt has nothing to do with Google and everything to do with JavaScript.
- hmmokidk 5y agoThe issue isn’t JS. Sites are bloated because cheap/lazy/dont care. Also because ads are bloating and payload size isnmt really thought about much.
- encryptluks2 5y agoThe issue is JavaScript unless you're talking about people that use BMP image format instead of JPG/SVG.
- lewisjoe 5y agoYou are asking for an alternative for browsers and 30 years of evolution. Be careful what you wish for :)
- grishka 5y agoWay too many abstractions.
- mrspeaker 5y agoYou got me wondering what was going on - 425Kb seemed pretty high. I imagined there would only be around 50K of non-compressed source code. Turns out the 200Kb+ culprit is the texture atlas I nabbed off the internet: https://github.com/mrspeaker/webgl2-voxels/blob/master/res/mine.png https://github.com/mrspeaker/webgl2-voxels/blob/master/res/m... - I'm only using a handful of cells out of that, I should chop it!