The point in the article that values should lead to decision making criteria is crucial, but not actually what they are used for in practice. I think it practic

The point in the article that values should lead to decision making criteria is crucial, but not actually what they are used for in practice. I think it practice they are meant as a framework for doing performance assessments. At least this was how it was in my previous companies. I always thought that was horribly cultish, because tthe interpretation of such pithy sentences is really subjective. A sentence like "Move fast and break things" could be interpreted as "try a lot and don't worry if things fail once in a while" but it could also mean "keep up and leave anyone who can't lying in the dust". Those interpretations represent two different companies. The former I would be willing to work at, the latter, not so much.