> in the feedback system which marries surveillance and the construction of personalized information streams. You've continued to terrify me. How can we constr

> in the feedback system which marries surveillance and the construction of personalized information streams. You've continued to terrify me. How can we construct "personalized information streams" without censorship? By definition you either allow someone to view information outside their stream, or you don't. It clearly sounds like you're saying we shouldn't allow people to construct their own streams, but have someone else do it for them. Therefore censorship. > I do not posit any particular answers. > But we need to have the hard discussion, the sooner the better. And again, what would the results of this conversation be? You have one side demanding control over speech, and the other demanding no control over it. One side, once some perceived threat arises, wants total control and extermination of the perceived threat. Yet the other side doesn't perceive this threat. The other side believes this threat to be an authoritarian attempt to stifle non-aligned speech and thoughts. What great societal damage has you wanting to control speech so much? COVID? Vaccine hesitancy?