2 ms·
California is no different than the rest of the US in this. Probably because motorcycles account for nearly nothing in terms of actual miles driven/ridden. It’
by bradlys 5y ago
California is no different than the rest of the US in this.
Probably because motorcycles account for nearly nothing in terms of actual miles driven/ridden. It’s incredibly common to find 10+ year old bikes with <10k miles on them. This is ignoring that bikes are basically declining in sales overall too since the 90s.
People just notice them because bikes are novel when on the road. No different than seeing an exotic car.
See: https://www.bts.gov/content/us-vehicle-miles https://www.bts.gov/content/us-vehicle-miles
They’re less than 1% of miles accounted for. Trivial amount. I still think we should adopt Euro5 type standards or something but it’s just not worth fighting over for most of the US. Especially since a large portion of the motorcycle audience is boomers on Harley’s - and that would go counter to their whole lifestyle.
- jeffbee 5y agoNote that the largest source of fugitive hydrocarbons is parked motorcycles, because 1) CARB estimates that about 30% of bikes in the state have had their evap canisters removed, and 2) even the ones that still have their canisters can't work for more than about 7 days, so a motorcycle that doesn't have the engine started for more than a week leaks as much fuel as one that never had California emissions equipment in the first place.